Images of Michael Shields release

 September 10, 2009         1 Comment

Dave Evans has sent over some images of Michael Shields’ release, a story that look sure to dominate headlines for some time to come.

The local media has waged a vociferous campaign to have Shields freed, and local celebrities, clergy and footballers have also rallied to the cause.

Shields was freed following a Royal Pardon that was issued by Justice Secretary Jack Straw after receiving ‘fresh evidence which the Bulgarian court did not consider’ that indicated that Shields was ‘morally and technically innocent’ of the attack on a Bulgarian national.

Michael Shields release

Shields was convicted of attempted murder in a Bulgarian court in 2005 and sentenced to 15 years imprisonment, later reduced to ten. In 2006 he was transferred to a British prison.

Shields always maintained that he was asleep in bed at the time of the attack and a hotel night porter appeared to give Shields an alibi, while another man, Graham Sankey, later confessed in writing to the specific attack, later withdrawing this confession.

Sankey’s confession was not admissible as he refused to repeat it in the Bulgarian court.

In July this year, Straw provisionally denied Shields a pardon, after the Court of Appeal chucked the case back to the Justice Secretary. At this point Shields’ father announced his intention to stand as MP for Blackburn against Straw at the next election.

Following a meeting with Shields’ parents in August, Straw decided to grant the pardon.

Straw says that at this meeting he was given ‘important new evidence’, which convinced him that his former decision was wrong.

Shields house release

Straw appears to indicate that this new evidence derives from a verbal Sankey confession, allegedly made to Shield’s family members in 2005, and that Merseyside police have uncovered corroborative evidence relating to that confession.

Straw says this of the evidence:

I will not set out in this statement all the evidence that has come to light over the last two weeks but suffice it to say that there is very good reason to believe I was being told the truth.This in my view profoundly changed the credibility of the various accounts of what actually happened in this case.

This evidence, says Straw, was not available at the time of the Bulgarian trial, nor had he been previously aware of it. Shields’ current solicitors were not aware of the evidence either.

Of the assault, Straw says this:

It is not for me to say who was responsible for this disgraceful assault.

However, although Straw has been careful to word his explanations for Shields’ release, the new evidence that Straw finds so compelling can only point to one explanation.

A postscript to Straw’s statement sees him stating that Justice Secretaries should not, in the future, be responsible for handling such cases.

The Shields family say they intend to embark on an effort to clear Michael’s name in Bulgaria.

All images © Dave Evans


  1. Straw’s explanation is flimsy in the extreme. It smacks of any old excuse to get this business out of his hair. And who can blame him?

    But there’s something decidedly fishy here. If Sankey is now presumed by people locally to be the guilty party, why are the Bulgarians apparently unconvinced? The answer to that is quite simple: witnesses to the attack on Martin Georgiev reported to the police that the person who stood over Martin Georgiev as he lay, felled by two others, on the ground and dropped the paving slab on his head was “tall and fair-haired”. On that basis, the police detained Shields because he fitted that description. Sankey on the other hand is short and dark-haired; hence, he was not detained. The two others, Wilson & Thompson, were also arrested and subsequently found guilty of violent disorder. Shields, we know what happened.

    For these reasons, the Bulgarians argue that Sankey is guilty, by his own admission, of a separate matter. If he were to plead guilty to the Georgiev incident, the Bulgarian witnesses would have to change their evidence dramatically or the case against Sankey would collapse.

    That leaves open the identity of the “tall, fair-haired” assailant of Martin Georgiev. If not Michael Shields, then who? The Bulgarians have no doubt. They believe they got their man; and Jack Straw let him go.

Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.